We had a meeting a Hutton's school this morning about his "re-evaluation." They do these every three years in the special ed world, apparently, to make sure a child still qualifies for services (read: do they have to spend $).
I waited in the office for a few minutes, reading the "prepositional houses" a class of sixth graders had made, while they set up in the conference room. One of Hutton's aides came through the office and told me how adorable Hutton is, even though he "Loves Mrs. X [the other aide] and always wants to be with her, not me!" Still, I love hearing how adorable my child is. Then I walked into the conference room, where a small table was set up, with name tags all around marking places.
His occupational therapist, speech therapist, and the school nurse were there, and the school psychologist led the meeting. I sat at the place marked "PARENT!" Hutton's teacher wasn't there yet. (We heard about her child vomiting at 7:45 when she arrived a few minutes later.)
I don't really know why the nurse was there. Then again, the school psychologist asked if Hutton was on any medications, so the nurse was probably going to let us know how they could help keep him drugged at school. I told the psychologist he wasn't on any drugs, just a special diet and supplements.
Psych: "So...nothing for ADD, or anxiety?"
PARENT!: "No."
Psych: "Hmmm. OK."
Yes, apparently the "Autism expert" (read that with heavy sarcasm) school psychologist thinks we should be drugging Hutton to help with his "anxiety and ADD." I, on the other hand, consider those part of his Autism, which we're treating biomedically. You know, going to the cause of the symptoms, rather than just masking them with drugs. Oh well, as long as Autism is a "mental" disability, covered under the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DMS-IV), I guess school psychologists will be involved.
The real "experts", the therapists and I, made it a little clearer that most of Hutton's issues were sensory -- he doesn't like the computer lab when all of the computers are on at once, or the library as they are too loud. He doesn't like when lighting is not working. He must smell everything given to him, and if it smells good (as apparently, crayons, glue, and play-doh do) he will then taste it.
Fortunately, his teacher was in better form than she's been in the past, too. She referred to Hutton as a "smart cookie" at one point when discussing his academic performance, which she ranked on a Kindergarten or higher level. Everyone in the room (except the "PARENT!" of course) talked about how young Hutton is. (OH MY GOD! A 5 YEAR OLD! IN KINDERGARTEN! IMAGINE THAT!) This led me to believe that I really could have had him in preschool another year, but I'm one of those stupid parents who doesn't fight for what they think is best for their child.
Anyway, the gist of the meeting is that I have to get some forms signed by a doctor to prove Hutton still has Autism so they can continue giving him the therapies he needs which are written in his IEP. (Read: They need the form signed to get their $) Because apparently, in the World of Special Ed, kids lose their Autism diagnoses all the time. Wouldn't that be great if it were actually true?
I live for the day when I can go a re-evaluation meeting and actually have them reclassify Hutton as ineligible for services due to his losing his diagnosis.
5 comments:
That would indeed be a sweet day Laura and I hope it comes. Cheers...
What a coinkidink, we had a re-eval for our younger son Thomas today. I must say I'm very pleased with the results and plan for the next school year. Thomas has ADHD and at this time takes no medication for it. The head of the department reminded us that the decision to medicate is our decision, not the school's.
Jared's aggression problems have led us down the medication path, and after three years of trying 4 different meds, we have found that Integra - a reformulation of resperdal works very well for him. He was averaging 6 outbursts a day, now he might have one or two, and even those dissipate much sooner than they used to.
As we all know, different types of behaviors respond to different treatments, and the "experts" may make suggestions, but they must respect the way that your family has chosen to help Hutton.
Another year of pre-school wouldn't have been a great benefit for Hutton, the experts should have known that to be the case. The structure of the classroom is early intervention, and the sooner the better. Both of our boys entered special ed classes before their fourth birthdays, at the recommendation of the school board staff. Hutton must be doing well if they need a re-affirmation of his diagnosis.
One aside: last night Jared had his dinner in the back yard under the arbor. Claudio, the 18-month old son of a friend called us to show us that Jared was teaching Claudio how to dip his fries in ketchup. Seeing my son share something that he loves and being patient with his little friend brought tears to my eyes - but these were good old fashioned happy tears.
Have a great weekend.
I Just Tagged You On My Blog. List Five blogs that make you think.
I think schools will soon replace the Coke machines with Eli Lilly pill machines.....
Bada Bing, Good One Kim...
Lisa - It's not so much that his behavior warranted a re-eval, but that its a process automatically done every three years by the state. I do agree that Hutton didn't really need to be in preschool longer, but I miss the class because his teacher was great and got great stuff from Hutton!
That's really sweet about Jared showing Claudio how to dip the fries!
Kim -Oh no! I have to write an entry today now! :) You're right about the drug machines! That gives me a good idea -- a Houston's chewable enzymes machine in place of a candy machine. Wouldn't that be great for infractions? Hutton ate glue again! Hutton, go buy yourself some enzymes. They could sell them in rolls like Lifesavers!
Hi Matt!
Post a Comment